Heritage architecture

Modern architecture

Mayors' Neighbourhood


Parks and trails

Bed and breakfasts

High-rise condos?

Multi-building motels?



Contact us

(revised 14 December 2019)

At this writing, the future of the development site along River Road between Philip and John Streets is still up in the air. Markham-based Times Group Development proposed last summer to build the 34- and 7-storey condo towers shown above, comprising 384 dwelling units.

At its meeting on 12 November 2019, Niagara Falls City Council voted overwhelmingly to deny the application. Councillor Carolynn Ioannoni made the motion not to approve the project. Councillor Lori Lococo seconded it. These two, along with Councillors Wayne Campbell, Vince Kerrio, Wayne Thomson, Victor Pietrangelo, and Chris Dabrowski voted for this motion. Councillor Mike Strange voted against, that is, in support of the proposed condo towers.

In refusing to support the proposed condo towers, Council accepted the recommendation of the city's Department of Planning. Click here for the department's 18-page report, whose reasons for the unacceptability of the proposal included height, density, and nonconformity with the city's Official Plan. Click here for the letter from the Niagara Peninsula Conservation Authority, which found the applicant's geotechnical report inadequate. Click here for the letter from Niagara Parks, which also opposed the high-rise condo towers, arguing that "the skyline along the river's edge should be retained as much as possible as a tree-lined vista with low ground-oriented to low-rise buildings."

The Niagara Falls Review, St. Catharine's Standard, and Niagara This Week all published Ray Spiteri's account of the Council meeting, available here. Council's full consideration of the matter, including presentations by Planning Director Alex Herlovitch, by the applicant's representatives Ryan Guetter and others, and by local residents Ken Westhues, Debra Jackson-Jones (representing Citizens for Responsible Development), Rita Vetere, and Lorna Anstruther — all this can be seen and heard in the online video of the Council meeting, available here on the city's website. This agenda item begins at about 1:02 on the video, and continues for about an hour and a half.

Perhaps the most memorable quote from the lengthy discussion was from Ms. Anstruther, who said that although she does not herself live in the River Road Neighbourhood, she considers River Road, running alongside the Niagara River Gorge, as "our city's front yard." A 34-storey condo tower, she said, does not belong in our front yard.

City Council's vote is not the end of the matter. Already in spring 2018, the previous owner (Forme Development) appealed the matter to the provincial level, the Local Planning Appeals Tribunal. Click here for LPAT's file on the appeal, and here for the procedure and timeline ordered by the tribunal on April 18, 2019. According to the timeline, the parties to this proceeding will next convene on January 10, 2020. This meeting is scheduled to be by telephone conference call. Until Times Group withdraws its appeal to LPAT, or until LPAT upholds City Council's decision, the proposal to built the 34- and 7-storey condo towers remains alive. LPAT has the authority to overturn Council's decision and approve the proposed development. Only time will tell.



About 30 residents attended an informational "open house" at City Hall on Monday, 28 October 2019, for the 34- and 7-storey condo towers. Niagara This Week headlined its story on the event, "Residents 'dead set' against condo tower plan next to Niagara River Gorge":

Marya Buckingham had a blunt message for the developers planning to erect a highrise condo tower on River Road, next to the Niagara River gorge.

“Go back to the drawing board and find something that fits the neighbourhood,” she told them at a public open house at city hall recently, at which tempers frequently flared. “Do something that can be really outstanding … rather than picking up a piece of Toronto and dropping it on River Road.”

Click here for the full story on the open house, complete with photos of residents and of the owners, Amir and Saeid Aghaei, on the newspaper's website.

In the first week of November, mature trees were cut on the site of the proposed development, and demolition of the four existing houses began. Click here for description and photos on the SaveRiver Road Facebook page.

The scale of the proposed development is breathtaking: a building 110 m high with 384 dwelling units and three levels of underground parking. It would be the tallest residential building in all of Ontario, outside the Greater Toronto Area. On account of the high-rise hotels in Fallsview, Niagara Falls already has the tallest skyline in Ontario, outside the GTA. This development would extend the warren of skyscrapers beyond the tourist area into a heritage residential neighbourhood. It would be built, moreover, at the edge of the Niagara Gorge, without assessment by engineering specialists of the risk of rockfalls, damage to River Road, or eventual collapse of the condo towers themselves.

The proposal would require near-total disregard of the city's Official Plan. Current zoning allows a maximum of seven storeys and 119 dwelling units on the larger part of the property, three storeys and about a dozen homes on the remainder. The proposed density of 198 dwelling units per acre is double what is currently allowed, 96 units per acre. This would be the most massive development along the entire length of the Niagara Gorge.

Surprisingly, the new proposal is for a building evene taller than the 23-storey tower the previous owner proposed in 2017, which nearby residents strongly opposed and the city's Planning Department refused to recommend. Click here for the previous proposal, which was on City Council's agenda for June 19, 2018, but then deferred at the request of the applicant.

The proposal comes at a time when many cities in Ontario and beyond are placing height restrictions on new construction even in areas where zoning by-laws and official plans allow high-rise, high-density development. Click here for a CBC report on the measures taken in Hamilton last year to limit building heights and preserve heritage neighbourhoods. At 580,000, Hamilton's population is six times that of Niagara Falls. That a city so small as ours would throw height and density limits to the wind, threaten the Niagara Gorge, and diminish a heritage neighbourhood, so that people here could live as far from solid ground as people in downtown Toronto or Hong Kong, seems bizarre.

Ironically, the current owner, Times Group, is the same large, well-established Toronto developer who successfully took the previous owner, Time Development, to court for trademark infringement, and won the case. Click here for the court decision, which required "Time Development" to change its name to something that could not be confused with "Times Group." The new name was "Forme Development," but then this company, the one Times Group defeated in court, went bankrupt in October 2018. In May 2019, when the court-appointed Monitor put most of Forme Development's assets on the auction block, Times Group was the highest bidder for the development site on River Road in Niagara Falls. Click here for the full documentation. That is how this large, successful Toronto developer, with scant experience outside the GTA, has come to play a major role in shaping the future of the River Road Neighbourhood.

Another noteworthy aspect of the current proposal is that in the context of the Niagara Falls housing market, the dwelling units are small: most of them around 500 or 600 square feet. Condos at the nearby low-rise Makan development and at the Royal Port and Harbour Club developments in St. Catharines are more than twice as large. Having successfully built condo towers in Toronto with small dwelling units, Times Group may have the same business plan in mind for its venture into Niagara Falls.



In early October 2019, Times Group, owner of the development site on River Road between John and Philip Streets, submitted to the city a consultant’s report that dismisses concern about damage to the gorge from construction of 34- and 7-storey condo towers. Dated 4 October 2019, the report is an update of the geotechnical report submitted by the previous owner (click here), which also supported the project but without addressing risk of damage to the gorge or to the street that runs along its edge.

Like the first report, the update is by Golder Associates, one of the world’s leading engineering consulting firms. The bulk of it presents the same borehole data as before, but with additional calculations. Completely new, however, is Section 6, “Rock Slope Stability along River Road.” This section concludes as follows on p. 17:

Although bedrock excavation by blasting will result in ground vibrations in the rock along the gorge, the impact of this is expected to be relatively minor. In some circumstances where very loose, detached blocks or wedges of rock are present on the exposed surface of the rock face along the gorge (due to ongoing weathering and erosion), the blasting vibrations may cause some of these blocks or wedges to become unstable and fall into the gorge. However, many of these blocks or wedges would likely fall eventually due to the ongoing weathering including ice jacking in the winter months. The expected vibrations from the blasting, during the  bedrock excavation, are not anticipated to have any significant impact on the larger overhangs, such as those described above, or the overall stability of the rock slopes along the gorge near the site. Therefore, a large failure which would compromise the sidewalk or roadway is not anticipated.

No one should hesitate to read this section of the updated report out of fear that the procedures and equipment used to assess slope stability are too specialized and complex for a nonengineer to understand. On the contrary, anybody with a measuring tape and camera can replicate the study on his or her own.

As described on p. 14, the procedure was to walk on the sidewalk on the east side of River Road from Hiram St. north to Eastwood Cr. and look from time to time along the way over the wall toward the gorge. This is what one of Golder’s geological engineers did on 16 September 2019. The idea was “to visually inspect what can be seen of the rock slopes from the sidewalk of River Road in order [sic] identify any areas of potential instability.” The authors of the report, Rafael Abdulla and Andrew Hagner, caution that “the visual observations were limited by the available vantage points along the River Road sidewalk and were sometimes obscured by the vegetation along the crest of the slope.”

A notable difference between the initial geotechnical report and this update is that the former left open the question of whether excavation in the bedrock would be done by blasting (explosives) or by mechanical rock-breaking technology. It said blasting would be faster, but might not be allowed. This update, by contrast, seems to assume that the excavation will be by blasting, which generally causes more vibration than rockbreakers. The key question, of course, is how much vibration, regardless of the technology causing it, the gorge wall can withstand without risk of major rockfalls. Neither the original report nor this update addresses this issue.

Click here to read the full report (see especially pp. 14-17), or skip to the section below for evidence of the need for a thorough slope stability study before any large-scale project is begun.


Proposals of commercial or high-density residential development of the block of River Road between Philip and John Streets have been made at least since the 1980s. Approval and construction would be major steps toward destroying the River Road Heritage Neighbourhood in favour of a warren of skyscrapers as in Mississauga, Brampton, Markham, and other cities of the Greater Toronto Area.

Not surprisingly, residents of this district have repeatedly come together to oppose such proposals, arguing that developments so tall and dense should be restricted in Niagara Falls to those areas (like Fallsview and the Queen Street Business District) where they are allowed by the Official Plan and zoning by-law. Residents argue that any new construction in the River Road Heritage Neighbourhood should be in keeping with its existing character, as explicitly required by the Official Plan, and should entail minimal risk to the gorge and natural environment.

The paragraphs below provide links to the main documents about the repeated eruptions of conflict since 2006, involving developers, residents, the city's planning department, the Mayor, and City Council, as well as the government of Niagara Region and the Niagara Parks Commission. Many relevant documents are also available on the richly informative SaveRiverRoad Facebook page, maintained by resident Debra Jackson-Jones.

The basic issue: risk to the Niagara Gorge

Setting aside issues of neighbourhood compatibility, could high-rise condo towers safely be built along River Road? Might excavation and construction destabilize the wall of the gorge? Might sections of River Road fall into it? Might the buildings themselves sooner or later give way? Until now, no buildings more than four storeys high have been built anywhere along River Road. Nor are there tall buildings near the edge of the gorge on the American side. Massive construction 25 or even 50 m from the edge of the precipice would be unprecedented, new, untried.

Questions like these are common all around the world, wherever construction is contemplated near cliffs and steep slopes. A huge mass of knowledge in the science of rock mechanics has been accumulated, and sophisticated techniques devised for assessing geologic risks. Engineering specialists in this field could conduct a slope stability analysis of the section of the gorge at issue here and estimate the odds that this natural environment can and cannot sustain large-scale development. No such study is available, but abundant historical evidence points to the need for the most careful scientific analysis before any such development is seriously contemplated:

  • History of rockfalls. The walls of the gorge are not monoliths. They consist of uneven strata of shale, limestone, and earth, riven by fissures and fractures through which groundwater seeps, freezes, and thaws. This makes for instability. Rockfalls are routine. The Great Gorge Route, a spectacular railway built in 1891 along the river at the bottom of the gorge, suffered one rockfall after another until an exceptionally big one in 1935 put it out of business. Hikers today can see where the railroad used to run.
  • Disappearance of Prospect Point. Click here for a video of the collapse of part of the gorge wall in 1954, at Prospect Point on the American side, about 500 m across from where high-rise condos have been proposed on the Canadian side. Notice how the crack started small, then widened until the entire promontory gave way. Even without human help, the same thing could happen to any section of River Road. The question is only of probabilities.
  • The Schoellkopf disaster. Almost directly across from the proposed high-rise site are the ruins of the once massive Schoellkopf Power Plant, which lasted half a century before a build-up of hydrostatic pressure caused the gorge wall behind it to collapse and crush the entire structure in 1956. Thirty-nine workers managed to escape, some with injuries. One worker was killed. The photo shows how the enormous building looked after natural forces got the best of it.
  • Record of seismic tremors in Niagara. Seismologist Austin McTigue, longtime chair of physics at Canisius College in Buffalo, attributed the Schoellkopf disaster of 1956 to an earthquake in Niagara ten years earlier, on 20 September 1946 (see the 1962 article or this 2014 report). McTigue pointed out that this area is on a fault line, that the 1946 quake had widened a crack behind the power plant, and that ice jacking had caused the crack to widen further over the next decade, until the face of the gorge gave way. The evidence is clear that the Niagara peninsula is among the more quake-prone areas of North America (click here for a map). At a public meeting in September 2017 on the proposal to build high-rise condo towers on River Road, the architect for the project voiced concern about vulnerability to seismic tremors.
  • City's insistence on geologic study 40 years ago. In 1980, the Planning Department of the City of Niagara Falls produced a 31-page report identifying four alternative futures for the River Road area. According to the report, no redevelopment plan should be undertaken until a careful geologic study of the natural environment would be done. The report said problems of stresses and faulting along the gorge should be investigated to determine which areas "have the load-bearing capacity to accommodate new development."
  • The slope stability analysis of 1982. In fact, the city did commission in 1980, a slope stability study of the gorge wall along the full length of the River Road Heritage Neighbourhood, from Hiram St. all the way north to Ellis St. In 2019, Debra Jackson obtained from the city the contract for this $21,000 study, but neither the city nor Golder (the respected engineering firm that did the work) has been able to locate the study itself now 40 years after it was done.
    Fortunately, a resident named James Hennessey (1920-2001) obtained a copy in 1982, when the study was discussed at City Council, and gave his summary of its findings to the Niagara Falls Review. According to Hennessey, the report identified five areas along the gorge as "extremely sensitive," with the stretch between Hiram and Eastwood being worst of all. By his reading, the report found the gorge wall to be so fragile that no development should be allowed closer than 200 feet (65 m) from the rim.
    In the absence of the 1982 report itself and of any later slope stability analysis, the summary in the Review remains the most authoritative professional assessment to date: that the risk of damage to the gorge wall by large-scale construction along River Road is unacceptably high.
  • Hydro poles installation. Among the many objections to a proposal for high-rise condo towers in 2006 was one that deserves special attention, since it came from Bill Barrett (1931-2011), owner of the company that had recently installed hydro poles along River Road in the area at issue. In his letter to the city strongly objecting to the proposal, Barrett pointed out that securing the poles was difficult on account of there being little overburden in which to embed them. In Barrett's opinion, the wall of the gorge along River Road is too unstable, fragile, and vulnerable to rockslides, to allow large-scale construction next to it.
  • The rockfall of 13 January 2018. Click here for photos of the recent rockslide near the corner of Eastwood Crescent and River Road, graphic evidence of the fragility of the walls of the Niagara Gorge.

In September of 2017, in the face of Time Development's proposal to build high-rise condo towers between Philip and John Streets on River Road, I sent a detailed letter to the city's planning department, asking that "the current proposal, or any proposal of similar magnitude, not be approved until engineers expert in rock engineering and slope stability assessment certify that the risk of environmental damage to the Niagara Gorge and to nearby homes, as well as the risk of future instability of the towers themselves, is no higher than for projects commonly approved in other jurisdictions." To my knowledge, no study has been done in response to my request, and the certification any reasonable observer would insist on is not yet available.

Further background

As of October 2019, this webpage is still under construction. In the meanwhile, you may wish to browse through some of the following documents on the successive proposals for high-rise, high-density development of the John-Philip block along River Road, and what became of them.

The proposal of 29 storeys in 2006. This file brings together a wealth of documentation on a 250-unit proposal by O.R.E. Development, an affiliate of the Opus Group in Minneapolis, a major developer of commercial properties. Niagara Falls solicitor Italia Gilberti represented the company. Residents of the neighbourhood and the city's Planning Department opposed the proposal. City Council approved it anyway. It was later withdrawn.

The compromise proposal of 4-7 storeys in 2008. These are minutes of the City Council meeting of October 6, 2008. A new owner, Niagara Falls Pointe Ltd, proposed a 4- to 7-storey building with 119 units. Italia Gilberti was once again the proponent's solicitor. The Planning Department recommended in favour. City Council approved it. The resultant rezoning and amendment to the Official Plan remain in force as of 2019.

The Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) decision of 2009. Many nearby residents found even the compromise proposal of 119 units too high and dense. Led by F. J. Prentice, they therefore appealed Council's approval of it to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB). This is the full text of the OMB decision, upholding Council's approval and confirming that the development could proceed.

The city's closure and sale of River Lane, February 2017. Niagara Falls Pointe did not proceed with the building approved by City Council and the OMB. For the next eight years, the property was neglected and overgrown with weeds. Then suddenly, the city solicitor recommended to Council that the city declare surplus the street next to the property at issue, River Lane, and sell it to a new owner for $12,000. Here are minutes of the meeting at which Council approved this recommendation. The buyer was Time Development Group, a company in Markham controlled by Mike Wang.

Community information meeting, April 2017. This is the flyer distributed to residents living near the development site. At this meeting, held at Simcoe Street Public School, residents were informed of the new owner's plan to build 12- and 21-storey condo towers with 390 units. The drawing at right shows the towers as described at that meeting. Planner Ryan Guetter chaired the meeting. Italia Gilberti was present, representing the new owner.

Public meeting at City Hall, September 2017. This is the flyer, "Fourteen Fast Facts" about the developer's proposal, that I circulated to residents before this second meeting, again chaired by planner Ryan Guetter. The proposal was essentially the same as presented in April.

. . .

ONE MORE LINK: In November 2018, I sent to the Mayor and Councillors a detailed report on the five main irregularities so far in the handling of the 2017 proposal to build high-rise condo towers. Click here to read my report. I recommended that Council refer my report to its solicitor for this matter, Tom Halinski, and to request his opinion and advice. By majority vote, Council declined to do so, instead simply received my report for information.

Forward to Multi-Building Motels?                         Back to Home